Pedestrian

One of the happy rediscoveries of painting on the sidewalk and in the alley around my house is how transitory and unstable even the most mundane, unremarkable view can be.

One day the neighbor’s back gate is open so I can see all the way down the gangway between houses to the next street. When I go back out there again, the gate is closed. Roughly a fifth of my painting is what I can see past that closed gate. Do I paint in the wooden slats where the walk and steps were or leave it as is?

Unlike a photograph, a painting always acknowledges and often incorporates the passage of time. There’s no way not to grapple with change if for no other reason than standing outside the light will change from minute to minute. There are artists, of course, who go outside only to gather information for reproducing some ideal picture in their heads. I have nothing in mine so I depend on what comes in through my eyes.

I’m not saying I’m a machine coldly recording and reproducing whatever crosses its path. Hardly. Only that the subject-matter always comes from without rather than within. Once a place is chosen, there are endless choices to make, and each one taken negates dozens of others. I can’t claim any sort of objectivity or impartiality, but if I do my thing right, other people will see something they recognize in my pictures. This is as true with the collages as these plein-air streetscapes.

Aside from the stray dumpster diver, dogwalker, or illegal construction trash dumper, I don’t have many personal interactions in the alley. The people who go there don’t often want to socialize. The alley is about doing business away from prying eyes. Half the people who went past my easel don’t even acknowledge my presence.

The front walk is a different story. The neighbor across the street waves and yells out that my painting looks great, even though he hasn’t seen it. Some dogwalkers will cross the street when they see me out there; others will let their pets sniff around. The guy next door whose yard is filled with bikes he refurbishes and sells always says hello. I don’t know what he thinks of what I’m doing. Whether he thinks about it at all.

Being out there reconnects me with something I didn’t know I missed. Stepping out of my house and trying to catch a bit of what it’s like to live on this street at this time gives me a sense of belonging. It makes me appreciate the roof over my head and even the sun burning my face. Lets me know that this is exactly where I’m supposed to be.

A talk with Matt Grimm about his quarter-life crisis and with Mallory about Alien.

If you wanna buy one of the recent paintings done around my house, they’re up in my store.

First & Last

I went to the museum the other day and saw some ink paintings that pissed me off. They were from the 60s and 70s but done to make sure even a casual viewer would know they reference traditional Chinese painting. Not awful just mediocre. The kind of stuff that might decorate a therapist’s waiting room. What pissed me off was they were in a world-class museum.

I don’t entertain these thoughts too often because they would stop me from continuing but the crappy ink paintings made me wonder out loud why my work wasn’t in the museum. Who decides what gets in?

Art has been used since forever to make political and economic deals go down easier. The only way I can accept these ink paintings’ place in the museum is as tokens of diplomacy. I don’t know the particulars nor do I want to.

What if some billionaire politician came to me and said I could have a show at the museum to help him promote his slave colony in outer space? Would my ego allow me to refuse? I’ve spent my whole life doing a thing that’s been largely ignored. Now a guy comes and offers me more exposure than I ever dreamed of. Could I say no?

What if I say yes and the exhibition is a success. Can I show my face in the museum after, knowing what the success cost? At this point, I’d welcome such a problem but have no clue what I’d do.

It’s a weird time for museums in general. People are asking about how and why they show what they show in ways they didn’t used to. I read an article about some new museum in Germany filling rooms with looted Chinese art. How can the public get anything out of it, no matter how beautiful it is, knowing how it got there?

I guess I can feel thankful that my anonymity keeps my pictures ethically pure. But does it really? Is that even a thing to aspire to? I’m not making objects of devotion likes Buddhas or Christs. There’s no morality test as part of my creative process. What makes me so sure I’m on a more righteous path than the guy in the museum with his crappy ink paintings?

The thing I thought looking at them is that given those same walls I could fill them better. This may be sour grapes or delusion but I don’t think so. The result of a long and deep engagement with a thing gives a person the right to discern good from bad in a pretty unilateral way. You get to know a thing from the inside. How it was made, what it took, and you can judge it at a glance. This doesn’t mean anyone else will agree or even listen. It’s not like I can take my certainties to the curator and she’ll throw these paintings in the dumpster out back like she should.

I’m busy taking out my own trash. I hauled a bunch of art-school-era paintings and drawings from my parents’ basement back to Chicago. I’m trying to breathe some life into them. It’s weird to look at this stuff after thirty-plus years. Some are no better than the thrift-store castoffs I salvage for frames; others have a few square inches worth keeping, surrounded by yards of dead space. A few contain history that’s best rubbed out and forgotten.

They aren’t bound for the Art Institute. Not right away anyhow. They’ll hang in a bar and the front of a frame shop this summer and my conscience can stay clear and clean. Few people will question whether they belong on those walls except painters even lower down the food chain. They’ll look and wonder why my work is up instead of theirs like I wonder about the ink painting guy in the museum. It’s an endless cycle.

I’ll hope that somebody likes a few of them and takes them home so I don’t have to bring them back here.

Listen to a talk in Russian with my father.

RIP Sam Gross.

to whom

I ordered the blank book from Katya in Sarov months ago. Since the war started, buying from her is more difficult. No Etsy, no Paypal. Using payment sites I’ve never heard of. But I want to help her in whatever little way I can. The people who stay in my cursed home country may be damaged more permanently than its declared enemies.

A light grey plastic cover decorated with birds on branches, lavenderish cardstock inside. It’s from the 70s or 80s, I think. Soviet times, just like everything else I buy from Katya. A lot of this stuff is crummy but it tugs at me in a primal way. I feel like a knockoff made of inferior materials sometimes too. Whatever I’m made of, I was made in the same time and place as these relics I buy off the internet.

I figured I’d use the book for collage since that’s what I’m mostly doing now but didn’t decide to dedicate it solely to chopped up personal correspondence till it arrived in the mail. Most of what’s gone in has been source material for the book of letters I’ve been working on. I realized at some point in the process I didn’t like the idea of strangers reading through this personal archive after I’m gone, so I’m slowly transforming it into pictures to accompany my own words.

It’s not that there are many deep dark secrets to be uncovered in the old letters. It’s more a question of honoring the senders’ privacy and preserving the idea that the letters were only meant for one recipient. The things I’m writing aren’t really meant for the writers I’m responding to. It’s public rather than private writing. The context is completely different.

It’s freeing to rip up this old paper. Something of a cleansing ritual about it. Not that I expect to come out the other end shiny and new; only a little lighter, with a few less pieces of baggage.

The blank book is all full now. It sits on the side-table to the left of my armchair. I flip through it every few days. Every page contains fragments that send me down rabbitholes. It’s sometimes unsettling. But everyone’s history is this way probably. It’s a lot easier than rereading the letters was. The ripped leftovers aren’t suspended in amber. Forced through the shredder of collage they must resonate with a new polarity. They don’t all sing but some do.

My job is to send them through the chute and see if they hold their shape, transform, or blow apart.

I talk with my mom about her early days and Mallory and I talk Food of the Gods; I recommend Christian Mungiu’s R.M.N. in this week’s Cine-FILE.